Local residents and officials express safety concerns over new energy project.
Topics covered
In a controversial move, developers are being labeled as “reckless” as they seek approval from the Scottish Government for a battery storage facility at Countesswells, following a rejection from Aberdeen City Council. The proposed facility, which would have a capacity of 40MW, involves the installation of 48 lithium-ion batteries housed within 12 shipping-container-sized cabinets.
Local opposition and safety concerns
The initial plan was denied by local councillors in September, who expressed concerns that the industrial site would be “out of place” near Countesswells Road. The proposal has faced significant opposition from various stakeholders, including Robert Gordon’s College, which is located just meters away from the proposed site.
College officials have voiced fears that a fire at the battery storage facility could expose students to “potentially toxic vapour, fumes, or smoke.”
Adding to the outcry, over 107 letters of objection were submitted to the local authority by concerned residents. Many locals share apprehensions about the safety implications of having such a facility in close proximity to a school. The developers, however, argue that there is a pressing need for the battery storage site, claiming that the chosen location is optimal due to its size and proximity to the Craigiebuckler substation.
Developers defend their proposal
Flexion Energy UK Storage has stated that their proposal complies with all relevant national, regional, and local planning regulations, as well as specific criteria for energy sites. They contend that the refusal of their application is hindering the establishment of critical infrastructure necessary for renewable energy development amid a climate crisis. The developers assert that the benefits of renewable energy, combined with the suitability of the site and proposed mitigation measures, warrant a reconsideration of the council’s decision.
In response to the appeal, three community councils have united to oppose the project, emphasizing that while they recognize the need for battery storage, it must be situated in “appropriate” locations. Colin Morsely from the Cults, Bieldside, and Milltimber Community Council remarked on the importance of environmental protection and public safety, criticizing the developers for ignoring evolving government regulations and safeguards.
Community concerns and next steps
Residents like Kirsten Buck have expressed their fears regarding the safety of the proposed battery energy storage system (BESS), labeling it as “high risk.” Buck, a mother of two, highlighted the dangers of situating such a facility adjacent to a school playing field, which is actively used by children. She referenced past catastrophic incidents involving similar facilities both in the UK and globally, stating, “As a parent, the potential consequences are terrifying.”
The public has until Friday to submit further comments on the development. A representative from Holyrood will subsequently be appointed to review the situation and make a final decision regarding the fate of the battery storage facility. The outcome of this appeal could set a significant precedent for future energy projects in the region, balancing the need for renewable energy infrastructure with community safety and environmental considerations.
Leave a Reply