Traders argue against Aberdeen City Council's bus gate measures, claiming illegality.
Topics covered
Aberdeen bus gates controversy: Traders challenge council’s legal stance
The ongoing dispute over the controversial bus gates in Aberdeen has escalated as local traders take legal action against the city council. The traders, represented by lawyer Alasdair Sutherland, argue that the council’s decision to make the bus gates permanent is unlawful on multiple grounds.
This legal battle highlights the tensions between local businesses and city officials regarding traffic management and its impact on commerce.
Traders’ claims against the council
Traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the council’s implementation of the bus gates, which they believe have negatively affected their businesses.
Sutherland has filed official papers to challenge the council in court, asserting that the decision to make the bus gates permanent was made without proper legal authority. He claims that the council should have sought permission from the Scottish Government before taking such a significant step.
In response, Aberdeen City Council’s top solicitor, Alan Thomson, has firmly defended the council’s actions. He maintains that the council acted within its legal rights and that the measures were introduced in accordance with the law. Thomson’s assertion that the council did not require consent from Scottish ministers has been a key point in their defense.
The council’s legal strategy
Despite the traders’ claims, the council’s legal team remains resolute in their position. Thomson has stated that the council’s decision-making process was both proper and correct, dismissing the traders’ arguments as a “massive interpretation” of the law. He has indicated that the council is prepared to fight the case vigorously in court, having sought further legal advice from the King’s Counsel.
Thomson’s confidence in the council’s legal standing is evident, as he emphasizes that the council’s interpretation of statutory provisions is sound. He has also expressed a willingness to answer questions from councillors regarding the legal proceedings, although he insists that discussions take place in private to protect the council’s interests.
Public sentiment and the traders’ resolve
As the legal battle unfolds, public sentiment appears to be largely in favor of the traders. Many residents have voiced their concerns about the bus gates, arguing that they hinder access to the city center and negatively impact local businesses. Norman Esslemont, a prominent figure in the traders’ campaign, has been vocal about the need for transparency and accountability from the council.
Esslemont has successfully raised significant funds to support the legal challenge, reflecting the strong community backing for the traders’ cause. He expressed disappointment with the council’s handling of the situation, stating that the overwhelming public desire to scrap the bus gates has been ignored. Despite the challenges ahead, he remains optimistic about the traders’ chances in court, believing that they have a solid case.
The road ahead
As the court proceedings approach, both sides are preparing for a legal showdown that could have significant implications for traffic management in Aberdeen. The outcome of this case will not only determine the fate of the bus gates but also set a precedent for how local authorities engage with businesses and the public in future decision-making processes.
With the traders rallying support and the council standing firm in its legal interpretation, the coming weeks will be crucial in shaping the future of Aberdeen’s city center. The community’s voice, alongside the legal arguments presented, will play a pivotal role in this unfolding drama.
